In Defense of Traditional Marriage By R. Anderson Essay

In Defense of Traditional Marriage By R. Anderson - try on ExampleAnderson in his article about traditional sexual unions argues that a marriage should still be viewed in the traditional sense of it being a reunion between a man and woman for the think of procreation as is indicated in the constitution (Anderson, 2013). His disceptation therefore dispels the gay activists attempts to have this wording changed in the formal documents simply because they have already been accorded the right to come up married. The article further ascertains that this comment of marriage has been in existence way before there was any evidence of same sex marriages and therefore can non be changed now. Furthermore, the moment the federal government testament change this definition it will mean that it will be on the road to changing other things as well and being cornered to pass on enforcement of other untraditional abridges in the marriage institution such as allowing polygamy and the likes. Anderson stands with his word that simply because the gays were allowed to get married in the states that they have does not allow them the power to demand a change of the traditional institutional definition of marriage (Anderson, 2013). They should be glad with what they have been accorded and remain silent on the issue and let traditions remain as they have always been.The melody by Anderson leans more towards deductive argumentation where he starts by stating the general rules and laws of marriages that have always been and moves to focusing on the sole aspect of procreation. This argument is based on only one major point and a few others that are not too strong to support the traditional marriages or even provide enough reason to bar the definition of marriage being changed in the constitution despite it being an age old definition whose changes will open up a Pandoras box of other issues related to modern marriages. The argument of